Slavery3 Essay Example For Students

Slavery3 Essay An individual who is held in subjugation to another; one who is entirely dependent upon the desire of another; one who is held as ownership; one who has no opportunity, however who is and benefits are completely heavily influenced by another, this is the meaning of an ordinary slave. What rings a bell when you hear the word slave? What do a great many people picture in their mind when they hear the word Slave? A great many people consequently observe distinctive shading when the word slave is referenced. Individuals in this general public dont see the truth about or recognize individuals, yet what they do. Generalizing is simply in people groups nature, it is simpler to mark somebody by class, than by quality of character. Generalizing, is the means by which individuals depict one another. A Seven-Eleven proprietor is consequently Indian, a Mexican must be a pack part, a rich individual of color is without a doubt a street pharmacist, a Persian should possess a corner store, and the rundown continues forever. For a similar explanation, when individuals hear the word slave, they picture a major, solid, charcoal hued African, working in a field some place in the south heavily influenced by a white man. Slaves and bondage has been around for a long time, route before America was established. In any case, another type of servitude developed with the disclosure of the New World. There is a wide range of angles subjugation, and every one of these points had its own impact on the history. Womens job in servitude, Plantation subjection and the Underground Railroad are a couple of themes that are critical throughout the entire existence of subjugation. What job did ladies play consistently? Slave families tended to be precarious, because of the idea of the organization of subjection. Experts could sell individuals from the family away on the off chance that they wanted, or could isolate the family on the ranch, making them work in various territories. In spite of this insecurity, the family would in general be a focal piece of a slaves life, it gave them something to clutch. Ladies assumed a critical job in the advancement of this family. Slave proprietors frequently didn't separate between sexual orientations on the field, and in this way the ladies regularly wound up working close by men in hands on work. Nonetheless, inside the slave network, there was a distinction. The men for the most part did the errands, for example, catching and chasing creatures for food, while the ladies accomplished a greater amount of the local obligations. While these local obligations would in general add more work to the slave womens day, the local work was a route for ladies to defy the ace to some extent. Ladies accomplished these work to keep themselves and their families solid, and would now and again help a runaway slave by accommodating that person. These duties were here and there a delight to slave ladies, since they offered a level of individual satisfaction. One slave ladies, Mary Colquitt, commented that her grandma and mom had regularly kept awake until late sewing garments for the youngsters, saying, Dey done it cause dey needed to. Dey wuz working for deyselves den.(Jones,29) Ironically, this work thinking about themselves and their families additionally profited the slave proprietors, since solid slaves implied that the bosses could get more work out of them, and therefore get more cash-flow when the yields were reaped. The family was essential to most slave ladies, and they had methods of ensuring that they remained together, however these werent idiot proof. A ladies allocated to the Big House when the remainder of her family was on the fields could revolt, therefore making a mistresss life hopeless by actually sitting idle. This would frequently make the special lady send the ladies to the fields, which is the thing that she needed in any case, so she could be with her family. (25) Another way a young ladies slave could make it feasible for herself to remain with her family was by getting pregnant at an early age. Experts avoided the selling of ladies that showed richness, since they would have the option to get bigger work power from these ladies. Additionally, slave families with small kids were bound to be kept together. In these manners, ladies oversaw keeping their families all together. Ladies slaves likewise spoke to a position figure inside their families and networks. Spouses were freque ntly ready to incite in any case non-forceful husbands into demonstrations of disobedience to the ace. Also, moms frequently taught their kids, showing them how to sew or do other family unit errands that they would should have the option to accomplish for their families. Senior ladies regularly held significant situations inside the network too. These ladies regularly learned home grown medication, and were seen as the specialists , which was particularly significant since the white specialist didn't visit frequently. Ned Chaney said of his Granny Silla, Everbody set a load of sto by her. I figure, since she done cumullated so much information an on the grounds that her head were so white.(40-41). Female slaves justifiably didn't need their kids to become slaves, in the event that it was conceivable at all to keep away from it. Along these lines numerous ladies attempted to escape with their kids. Some felt that theyd preferably slaughter their kids over have them become slaves. A genuine case of this is Margaret Garner. She and her better half and youngsters got away with a gathering of different slaves in the winter of 1856, when the Ohio River was solidified over. They made it to the opposite side of the stream (into opportunity), however there their followers found them. At the point when it got clear to Margaret that they would not stay free, she endeavored to murder her kids and herself. She cut the throat of her little girl, yet was limited before she could finish the assignment. She was then come back to her lord, after a Commissioner concluded that she was still lawfully a slave, yet she suffocated in a Not just did the ladies succumb to servitude, yet additionally th e African men who were wreck while being sent back to Kentucky. Not exclusively did the ladies succumb to subjection, yet in addition the African men were transported over from their motherland to till the ground of the New World. The warm atmosphere, unfathomable fields of ripe soil, long developing seasons, and various conduits gave good conditions to cultivating manors in the South (Foster 63). The lavishness of the South relied upon the efficiency of the manors (Katz 3). With the innovation of the cotton gin, extension of the nation happened. This required the spread of subjection (Foster 64). Their white proprietors controlled slaves, claimed by one out of four families, from birth to death. Dark men, ladies, and youngsters works in the fields and houses under loathsome conditions (Katz 3-5). The slave framework endeavored to devastate dark family structure and remove human nobility (Starobin, 101). Slaves had a hard existence on the Southern estates. Most slaves were brought from Africa, either abducted or sold by their clans to slave catch ers for abusing an innate order. Some were even exchanged for tobacco, sugar, and other valuable items (Cowan and Maguire 58). Those not slaughtered or sufficiently fortunate to get away from the slave-getting strikes were fastened together (Foster 64). The slaves had no comprehension of what was befalling them. They were from various clans and of various communicating in dialects. Most caught blacks had never observed the white cleaned outsiders who went ahead long, peculiar vessels to travel them over the sea. They could never observe their families or local terrains again. These sad individuals were shackled and packed firmly into the holds of boats for quite a long time. Some would not eat and others ended it all by bouncing over the edge (Foster 63). The Crucible Essay OutlineBy 1807, a law was passed to make it illicit to import any longer slaves. Farming enhancements tagged along, and with the set number of slaves left in the states, the estimation of the slaves went up rapidly. Nullification Societies started to shape, and alongside strict gatherings got dynamic in helping captives to opportunity (AFRO). The Railroad started to come to fruition. A shape that is right up 'til the present time hard to depict. Tracks were laid to help the captives to opportunity. Individuals talked in mystery to clear safe ways for the captives to run on. These were the tracks. Letters were sent that had wording or code for the blacks. A ton of the terms originate from things found along railways. This is on the grounds that genuine railways right now were the freshest thing and happened to be the subject of decision for discussion. This made it all the simpler for the assistants of the railroad to impart going unnoticed. Along the tracks, there were terminals, safe houses to remain. These were places of free whites or blacks where they could shroud when they werent running. The individuals who possessed the houses were regularly called conductors. The conductors regularly left various finishes paperwork for the captives to follow so they didnt go to houses that had a place with partners of the slave proprietors. A blanket on the clothesline portraying a house with smoke coming out of the smokestack was an indication of a sheltered station. A white ring of blocks around the highest point of a houses fireplace was another indication of a decent concealing spot. Shops that were protected frequently had an outline of an escaping man or lady on in sign. Different signs were utilized to control the slaves. There were thumps that slaves utilized when moving toward a house, creature calls, and lights hung in windows. At the point when a slave was moving to the following house along the railroad, this was cal led getting the following train (AFRO). There were additionally melodies that offered headings to slaves that were instructed to everybody with the goal that they may retain the way. One such, was Follow the Drinking Gourd The drinking gourd was the slaves phrasing for the large scoop. The Big Dippers handle focuses toward the north star, which they could use to discover their direction north. The melody gave tourist spots en route to follow and a section from it says, the dead trees will show you the way (AFRO). This was placed in the tune which is as it should be. The essayist of this melody, alluded to as Peg-leg Joe, drew an image of a peg legg on the dead trees along the track with charcoal. The accompanying section is Left foot, peg foot trav

China 1400’s Free Essays

In the mid 1400’s the vast majority didn't wander outside of their origination. Most didn't live long lives. They kicked the bucket either from labor, starvation, or disorder. We will compose a custom article test on China 1400’s or on the other hand any comparable theme just for you Request Now Their insight into Arts, medication, work, and law was limited to the little town and the families that lived there. They would have voyage just a couple of miles to the following town to exchange or shop for necessities. The heft of their food admission would have been corn, wheat, sorghum, rice and grain. In any case, not very far away in a similar world there were evangelists, pioneers, adventurers, heros, sailor, convoy pioneers and dealers. Pilgrims and champions advanced toward towns and brought individuals into their trap of systems most without wanting to. First and foremost shippers resembled lower class individuals. They were observed intently, and their exercises were controlled. Anyway as the world got greater the vendors developed in influence, riches, and status. China was a force house in the mid 1400’s. They were a propelled locale and would have been best arranged for the developing scene showcase. They were exchanging silk, flavors, tea, religion, and ailment. Affliction was a downside/hindrance of having explorers, shippers and merchants in your general vicinity. China had an armada of boats that made a trip to spots, for example, Calicut, Thailand, and different nations. Be that as it may, in 1421 a sovereign named Yongle halted a journeys by the Ming Fleet, and in 1436 ruler Zhu Qizhen requested the decimation of all shipbuilding plans. China got disconnected from different nations and disengaged from itself dealers and brokers were not upheld by the legislature and were not shielded from privateers. The populace nearly significantly increased in size from the 1400’s to the 1600 to an amazing 160 million. The greater part were poor and couldn't buy from Chinese brokers. The most effective method to refer to China 1400’s, Essay models

Learning Theory and Phobias

Learning Theory and Phobias Phobias Causes Print Learning Theory and Phobias By Lisa Fritscher Lisa Fritscher is a freelance writer and editor with a deep interest in phobias and other mental health topics. Learn about our editorial policy Lisa Fritscher Updated on February 21, 2020 SDI Productions/Getty Images More in Phobias Causes Symptoms and Diagnosis Treatment Types Learning theory is a broad term that includes multiple theories of behavior that are based on the learning process. Learning theory is rooted in the work of Ivan Pavlov, who was able to train dogs to salivate at the sound of a bell. Many treatments for phobias are based on these learning theories. Behaviorism Behaviorism is a learning theory that tries to explain human behavior and responses in terms of learned behaviors. This thought originated with Ivan Pavlov and his theory known as classical conditioning. The dogs’ salivation was an automatic response to the presence of meat. By pairing the presentation of the meat with the ringing of a bell, Pavlov was able to condition the dogs to respond to a new stimulus (the bell). Eventually, the dogs salivated when they heard the bell, even when the meat was not present. B.F. Skinner elaborated on Pavlov’s theory. His work introduced operant conditioning. In operant conditioning, behavior that is reinforced continues, while behavior that is punished or not reinforced is eventually stopped. Both reinforcement and punishment can be either negative or positive, depending on whether a positive or negative reward is being given or taken away. Today, reinforcement is seen as more effective than punishment in changing behavior. In terms of phobia treatment, behavioral strategies might involve forming new, more positive associations with feared objects or situations. For example, a person might practice relaxation techniques when they are exposed to what they fear. Eventually, the association with the relaxation response may replace the anxiety response. Cognitive Theory Cognitive theory focuses on an individuals thoughts as a crucial determinate of his or her emotions and behaviors. Our responses make sense within our own view of the world. Therefore, according to cognitive theory, it is important to change a person’s thoughts and beliefs in order to change his or her behaviors.  Information processing is how this mental process is commonly described with reference to phobias. According to cognitive theory, irrational responses are the result of automatic thoughts and erroneous beliefs. Cognitive reframing is a technique that is used to help the client examine his or beliefs and develop healthier ways of viewing the situation. Techniques such as thought stopping are used to help the individual stop automatic thoughts and replace them with new thoughts. Social Cognitive Theory Social cognitive theory is a variation on cognitive theory that addresses the effects that others have on our behavior. According to the principles of social cognitive theory, people learn not only through their own experiences but also by watching others. Whether or not people act on what they have learned depends on many factors, including how strongly they identify with the model, their perception of the consequences of the behavior, and their beliefs about their own ability to change old patterns. Social cognitive theory may help to explain the origin of many phobias. It can also be used to help treat phobias. A common technique is for the therapist to model a new behavior before asking the individual to perform it. Cognitive-Behaviorism Cognitive-behavioral theory is a blended theory that incorporates both cognitive and behavioral elements. According to cognitive-behaviorism, our responses are based on a complex interaction between thoughts and behaviors, with thoughts and feelings playing a major role in our behavior. Modern cognitive-behaviorism also incorporates elements of feeling-based learning theories, such as rational-emotive theory. According to these principles, we are complex human beings whose responses are based on ongoing interactions between our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. It is necessary to address all of these components in order to successfully change our reactions. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is currently the most popular method of therapy for treating phobias. This is a type of brief therapy in which successful results may sometimes be achieved in only a few sessions. This is important to many people whose health insurance plans may limit the number of visits they can make to a therapist per year. Which Learning Theory Is Most Popular for Addressing Phobias? As noted above, the most popular therapy for treating phobias at the current time is the blended theory of cognitive behavior therapy. This theory addresses the complex thoughts and feelings which interact to determine a particular behavior. This approach, as noted, is likely also the most rapid approach to addressing phobias, something important not only due to health care costs but in helping people cope with these sometimes difficult to treat concerns.

Grocery Shopping Is More Diversified And Evolved Than Ever...

Grocery shopping is more diversified and evolved than ever before. Whole Foods Market and Trader Joe’s have become household names while also innovating beyond regional and national traditional chains. Despite comparable size in terms of locations, each store’s growth has operated using a very different model. Also in comparison, the unassuming supermarket Roots also specializes in organic, fair trade and minimally processed natural foods but on a smaller scale. As Whole Foods has increased the number of retail centers that it operates, it has suffered accompanying growing pains in efficiently managing distribution of products to its stores. They are growing at such a fast rate that the chain struggle to keep up with the demand for products and to keep shelves stocked. The biggest reason for inefficiency is Whole Foods’ decentralized back-end. It has 12 geographic divisions, a national headquarters in Austin, regional distribution centers, bakery facilities, kitchens, seafood processing facilities, meat and produce procurement centers and a specialty coffee/tea procurement operation. Many scoff at its supply chain, considering it to be amateur and lacking in professionalism. But with ample margins, it does not face immediate pressure to enhance efficiencies. Product wise, Whole Foods is differentiated because all products are sourced locally. The stores operate under minimal governance and are given maximum freedom to source a product mix that is appropriate for theirShow MoreRelatedBasic Info About Tesco Malaysia2175 Words   |  9 PagesIpoh in January and Shah Alam in July 2005. We have also launched Tesco Banting, Tesco Express Selayang, Ipoh Kuantan in 2005. Tesco offers Malaysians a complete one stop shopping for their needs - fresh food to groceries from household needs to apparel. Tesco carries a total of 86,000 lines of products including more than 1,300 Tesco branded items. Tesco was founded in 1924. Over the past 81 years, as the retailing market has changed, the company has grown and developed, responding to new opportunitiesRead MoreTrader Joe’s vs. Whole Foods Market5259 Words   |  22 PagesMIT Students Trader Joe’s vs. Whole Foods Market: A Comparison of Operational Management 15.768 Management of Services: Concepts, Design, and Delivery 1 Grocery shopping is more diversified and evolved than ever before. Individuals across the nation have access to everything from exotic products to unique delivery services. Often, specialty stores have limited locations whereas specialty services have a limited reach. However, two retailers have expanded to hundreds of locations whileRead MoreBusiness analysis of J Sainsbury and Morrisons3726 Words   |  15 Pagesanalysis, we also investigate these two firms’ operating model, industry background, corporate social responsibility (CSR) relating to their stakeholders and their future development. 2. Introduction UK supermarket industry has evolved from traditional grocery retailing and expanded to financial services, clothing and consumer electronics retailing, and property investment. Apart from physical trading in store, most supermarket businesses also operate online, given the most of chance to reachRead MoreLidl Norway30015 Words   |  121 PagesDepartment  of  Economics  and  Business  Administration      i            ii      Abstract   When  talking  to  a  Norwegian  about  Lidl,  most   people  will  have  a  strong  opinion  about   the  company.  Ã‚  Some  will  tell  you  that  Lidl  was  a  positive  contributor  to  the  Norwegian   grocery  market,  because  of  their  low  prices  and  Ã¢â‚¬Å"exotic†Ã‚  products.  Some  will  tell  you  that   they  never  shopped  there,  because  they  didn’t  want  to  support  a  foreign  company  that   ignored  the  labor  unions,  build  large  and  unattractive  buildings  in  their  townsRead MoreBrick and Mortar Retail vs. E-Commerce. What Is the Solution?5704 Words   |  23 Pagesthe differences between brick and mortar retail and e-commerce followed by a description of what the final solution is to solve this problem. 2. Introduction In a world where technology is changing every day, traditional businesses are becoming more developed and taking advantage of the many positive attributes that e-commerce can offer. While traditional businesses (brick and mortars) have recently been faced with stiff competition from e-commerce; traditional firms are attempting to surviveRead MoreConsumer Behavior Towards Online Shopping18477 Words   |  74 PagesCONSUMER BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS ONLINE SHOPPING (E-Shopping) Submitted To, L.J. Institute of Business Administration Vastrapur, Ahmedabad Project Guide, Prof. Saurin Shah Submitted by Name Roll No. 1. Siddharth Iyer 47 2. Raj Joisar 55 3. Keval Amreliya 05 4. Dhanraj Solanki 145 5. Akash Gupta 43 6. Simpy Harwani 45 7.Read MoreMarketing Nivea4249 Words   |  17 Pageson how Nivea uses the various marketing strategies to improve their sales, create a brand name and promote their products. Its starts with a brief introduction of what Nivea is. It further goes on to give the history of Nivea, and how Nivea has evolved ever since. The report further goes on to explain how Nivea uses the four P’s of marketing that is product, price, place and promotion by giving the example of Nivea Visage Young range of products. Next in the report is a brief explanation about howRead MoreMarketing Nivea4238 Words   |  17 Pageson how Nivea uses the various marketing strategies to improve their sales, create a brand name and promote their products. Its starts with a brief introduction of what Nivea is. It further goes on to give the history of Nivea, and how Nivea has evolved ever since. The report further goes on to explain how Nivea uses the four P’s of marketing that is product, price, place and promotion by giving the example of Nivea Visage Young range of products. Next in the report is a brief explanation about howRead MoreBusiness Strategies Of Tesco PLC24572 Words   |  99 Pagespatient during my stay at above college during April 2011 to April 2012. I Wish Good luck to all for their bright future. ABSTRACT After reviewing the literature relevant to the business strategies and more specifically business strategies adopted by UK retailors over the time, and their impact on the performance of UK retail sector, this thesis restrains its research to a case study of the impacts of business strategies on performance management in UKRead MoreFinal Project on Mnc8557 Words   |  35 PagesWithdrawal: 16 Types 16 Horizontally Integrated Multinational Corporations 17 1 Joint Verture: 17 2-BRANCH: 17 3-FRANCHISE: 17 4-SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES: 18 5-MERGER 18 6-ACQUISITION: 19 Vertically Integrated Multinational Corporations 19 Diversified Multinational Corporations 19 Hierarchy of multinationals 19 Merits 21 Merits of Multinational Corporations: 21 General Merits 21 Benefit to the Resident: 21 Promotion of Trade 21 Strengthening of Domestic Competition 22 Technological progress

Ancient History Glossary Emperor Chin

Definition: Emperor Chin shih huang-ti was the first Chin (Qin) Dynasty emperor for which reason people call him simply the First Emperor. Appraisals of this 3rd century B.C. emperor vary. Some consider his government unprincipled, and him, a violent, superstitious ruler who ordered a bibliocaust. He condemned Confucianism and other schools of thought, save Legalism, which supported his imperial position. They say he buried alive Confucian scholars and artisans working on his funeral complex. Others praise him as a peace-bringing political and legal unifier, who built roads to handle the standard distance between carriage wheels, and started the Great Wall; a reformer, who standardized coinage, weights and measures, and the written language. Like the early Egyptian pharaohs, the first Chinese emperor expended prodigious resources provisioning the afterlife, including a subterranean palace and an enormous terra cotta army complete with life size, realistic, painted warriors, chariots and horses. Even the treadmarking on shoe bottoms was fastidiously individualized. A docent at the 2012 exhibition at the Minneapolis Institute of Art (Chinas Terracotta Warriors - The First Emperors Legacy) says the warriors are about six feet tall, which might seem tall as an average for the modern Chinese male, but is considered to be life size for these descendants of Steppe denizens. [See: What Armor Did the Qin Dynasty Warriors Wear?] Reign Originally called Ying Zheng, Emperor Chin was born in 260 B.C. and died in 210. His reign as king of the more than 500-year old state of Qin had started when he was only 13. Having unified the warring states, Chin became emperor of a unified China in 221 B.C. His rule as emperor had lasted for 12 years when he died at the age of 49. When he died, his body was covered by fish to disguise the odor and to delay news until his body arrived back home -- according to legend. Rebellion followed soon after. Weak successors followed, so his dynasty lasted only another three years. Warring States Emperor Chin put an end to the Warring States period in ancient Chinese history, which ran from about 475-221 B.C. It was a period of violence and chaos during which the philosopher Sun-Tzu -- called the author of The Art of War -- is said to have lived. Culture flourished. There were seven states of China during the Warring States period (Chin Qi Chu Yan, Han, Zhao, and Wei). Two of these states, the Chin and Chu (which had, incidentally, incorporated Confucius home state of Lu, in 249), came to dominate, and in 223, the Chin defeated the Chu, establishing the first unified Chinese state two years later, in the 26th year of King Chengs reign. (As first emperor of all China, King Cheng became known as Emperor Chin.) Historical and Archaeological Sources on Emperor Chin In 213 B.C., three years before Emperor Chin died, Chin ordered a book burning (bibliocaust) that was to destroy much of the historical record of earlier periods. Chin documents were probably destroyed in a palace complex-burning, by Hsiang Yu, in 208, two years after the first emperors death. Archaeological remains of the tomb of the first emperor, including the famous terra cotta army of more than 7000 men, and legal documents were found in the 1970s when farmers dug up unexpected quantities of pottery. Another source of information on Emperor Chin is the Shih chi (Historical Records), written by Han dynasty historian Ssu-ma Chien in around 100 B.C. This same historian and storyteller, also called Sima Qian, wrote a biography of the sage Confucius (Kongzi) Periods of Ancient China Also Known As: Chin shih huang-ti, Qin or Qin Shihuangdi, Cheng Alternate Spellings: Chin Shih Huang, Qin Shi Huangdi, Qin Shih Huang-ti, Qin Shihuang Examples: Chairman Mao, the famous leader of the Communist Party in China, who was in power when farmers unearthed the artifacts of the Emperor Chin in 1974, is credited with the following words or sentiments: What can Emperor Qin Shi Huang brag about? He only killed 460 Confucian scholars, but we killed 46,000 intellectuals. In our suppression of counter-revolutionaries, didnt we kill some counter-revolutionary intellectuals as well? I argued with the pro-democratic people who accused us of acting like Emperor Qin Shi Huang. I said they were wrong. We surpassed him by a hundred times.The Epoch Times Commentaries on the Communist Party References: New Scientist Nov 16, 1978Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China, by Frederick Paul Brandauer, Junjie Huang; (1994).Encyclopedia BritannicaThe Oxford Companion to Military History.Minneapolis Institute of Arts: Chinas Terracotta Warriors - The First Emperors LegacyChinese History (Mark Bender at Ohio State University) Go to Other Ancient / Classical History Glossary pages beginning with the letter a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | wxyz

In Construction Final Report Free Essays

Through this search we are able to identify analyze the factors through which small construction companies can gain competitive advantage over their close competitors. Also studied various Project Management techniques that can foster growth of small and developing companies in this sector. This report also identifies the upcoming opportunities that the small and budding companies have in the construction industry. We will write a custom essay sample on In Construction Final Report or any similar topic only for you Order Now Lastly, it also talks about the key hindrances faced by Indian construction companies in running their operations with suggestions to overcome them. Introduction The Construction industry of India is an important indicator of the placement as it creates investment opportune ties across various related sectors. The construction industry contributed an estimated RSI. 7,807 billion to the national GAP in 2013-14 which amounted to around 9%. The industry is fragmented, with a handful of major companies involved in the construction activities across all segments. Besides, there are medium sized companies specializing in niche activities and small and medium contractors who work on the subcontractor basis and carry out the work in the field. In 2011 there were slightly over 500 construction equipment manufacturing companies in al of India The sector is labor intensive and provides employment, including indirect jobs, to more than 3. 5 core people. The period from 1950 to mid 1 ass’s witnessed the government playing an active role in the development of these services and most of construction activities during this period were carried out by State owned enterprises and supported by government departments. In the first five-year plan, construction of civil works was allotted nearly 50 % of the total capital outlay. The first professional consultancy company, National Industrial Development Corporation (MIND), was set up in the public sector in 1954. Subsequently, many architectural, design engineering and construction companies were set up in the public sector such as Indian Railways Construction Limited (RECON), National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBC), Rail India Transportation and Engineering Services (RITES), Engineers India Limited (ELL) etc. As well as the private sector such as M N ADSTAR and Co. , Hindustan Construction Company (HOC), Nasals etc. In India Construction has accounted for around 40 per cent of the development investment during the past 50 years. Around 16 per cent of the nation’s working population depends on construction for its livelihood and rates assets worth over 200 billion per annum. Total capital expenditure of state and central government was approximately RSI. 8,021 billion in 2011-12 which rose from RSI. L ,436 billion in 1999-2000. The share of the Indian construction sector in total gross capital formation (GIF) came down from 60 per cent in 1970-71 to 34 per cent in 1990-91. Thereafter, it increased to 48 per cent in 1993-94 and stood at 44 per cent in 1999-2000. In the 21st century, there has been an increase in the share of the construction sector in GAP and capital formation. The main reason for this is the increasing emphasis on involving the private sector infrastructure development through public private partnerships (Peps) and mechanisms like build-operate-transfer (BOOT). LITERATURE REVIEW Introduction to the Indian Construction Industry The Construction Industry in India is the second largest employer of the country after agriculture, accounting for 1 1 % of Indian’s GAP. It employs more than 3. 5 scores people its total market size is estimated at RSI. scores. The level Of a country’s development is reflected by its infrastructure the desperate need for infrastructure development has increased the demand of the construction industry in India. The Indian Construction industry can be divided into three broad segments: Residential, Industrial, Commercial other buildings. Sewer, Roads, Highways, Bridges, Tunnels other projects. Specialized activity such as carpentry, painting, plumbing electrical work. Characteristics of the Indian Construction Industry Construction industry is a major job creator: The construction industry accounts for 1 1 % of Indian’s gross domestic product (GAP). The industry also generates huge employment opportunities, due to its constant requirement for skilled and unskilled laborers. Moreover, the overall growth of this industry is also positive for sectors such as steel and cement, which are key raw materials. Low entry barriers keep industry fragmented: The construction industry is highly fragmented as low fixed capital requirements for construction contracts remove entry barriers. Capital expenditure is only required for procuring necessary equipments unlike a manufacturing businesses, which require a setup of plants and machinery for production. Possibility of payment delays heightens working capital intensity: Construction projects are mainly funded and managed by the owner. Apart from the initial advance, contractors receive payments after each project lessons is completed. However, timely payments also depend on the owner’s credit profile and the nature of the project. Most projects, especially infrastructure, have a gestation period of more than a year. Any delay in payments can push up receivables. Such a scenario makes the construction industry working capital intensive. Projects awarded to lowest bidders, but execution skills crucial too: All governmental construction projects are awarded through a competitive bidding process as more domestic and international contractors have forayed into various infrastructure segments. The project is finally awarded to the sweets bidder. However, besides bidding qualifications, contractors also need to have strong project execution and technical skills to avoid cost and time overruns. To make these imperative, institutions such as National Highways Authority of India (NOAH) penalizes delayed execution of national highway projects, while awarding timely completion of the same. Input-related risks: Access to inputs is crucial for ensuring timely and cost- effective execution of projects. The major inputs for a construction include: 1 . Labor: Construction work involves both skilled and unskilled labor. Currently, instruction players are struggling with wage increases, which can be attributed to labor shortages and rising inflation. Local job opportunities from government welfare schemes, growth in the overall rural economy and migration of laborers to Gulf countries for better prospects are some reasons that have led to a shortage of construction laborers. To solve labor issues, improve quality and cut wage costs, construction companies are now increasing the extent of mechanization, particularly in huge infrastructure projects such as highway projects. . Raw material: The construction industry is raw material-intensive. Any change in prices of raw materials like steel, cement, bitumen etc. Impacts players’ profitability. However, the impact is limited to the extent of the proportion of fixed price contracts in a company’s order book. Some construction companies also own quarries so as to ensure constant raw material supply. 3. Land acquisition and government clearanc es: Land and the related government clearances are the other important inputs for construction work. Delays in these may increase the gestation period of projects, which can impact the profitability of the project. Recent developments in the Indian Construction Industry The Indian government has recently initiated some policy changes in some sectors of the industry and order inflows have improved in some others. Though, the strained financial position Of companies will continue to impact the industry’s execution pace in 2014-15. It is therefore expected that the industry’s revenues will grow at a tepid pace of 6% to 8% during the year. The poor financial position of construction companies is reflected in their poorly profitable and highly leveraged balance sheets. Operating margins of construction companies fell by about in 2012-13, as input costs rose ND lower margin segments such as road projects gained share in the order book. Competitive pressures have also been impacting margins. Slow execution and its impact on fixed cost of companies shaved off 5% to on an average, from the operating margins of companies in 2013-14. In order to protect their margins, players are now exercising more caution in bidding and competition in the industry has moderated. Yet, the hangover of aggressive bidding of the past and the current execution delays continue to weigh on profitability in 2014-15 also. Further, the gearing (Debt-Equity ratio) f construction companies has been rising over the past two years, impacting the financial flexibility of companies. Gearing of major construction companies rose to 3. 3 times in 2012-13, from 2. 1 times in 2008-09. Net margins, which had been sliding since 2010-11, fell further by 7% in 2012-13 owing to higher interest outgo. The industry (with the only exception of LT) reported net losses from April 2013 to October 2013. According to the twelfth five year plan, more than 40% of the total government spends have been allocated to construction per SE explicitly, along with various construction projects that will be undertaken for other areas of expenditure. The table below illustrates the sector wise investments for the twelfth five year plan. Five Forces Analysis of the Indian Construction Industry Us mammary: The construction and engineering industry is characterized by large incumbents operating alongside smaller companies. Rivalry is eased somewhat by companies diversifying operations into other sectors. There are a small numbers of buyers in this industry, and typically large in size. Similarly suppliers have a great deal of power over market players as their raw materials are essential for players’ businesses. However suppliers have also offered the effects of the global economic crisis, seeing the prices of many raw materials rise. There are few, if any, substitutes available in this industry. Bargaining power of Buyers: Buyers in this industry tend to be large and few in number. Typically the main buyers are government agencies or large private-sector customers, usually corporate rather than individuals. Generally, in this industry, customers invite market players to tender for contracts which are on the customers’ terms. This means the buyer is in a more powerful position as they specifically define the parameters of the project. How to cite In Construction Final Report, Papers

The Station Nightclub Fire

This fire occurred on February 21, 2003 and caused a death toll of 100 people in that club. 96 people died on that night whereas the remaining four succumbed to death while undergoing treatment in hospitals in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Investigations carried out revealed that interior finish of the club played made fire ignite easily as well, as spread rapidly within the building.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Station Nightclub Fire specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The investigation also revealed that the presence of combustible interior finish in the area where fire started affected the capability of those inside to egress the building when fire broke out. It is believed, that fire brought conditions that hindered people from reaching the exits, which made them, be overcome by heat and smoke. Pyrotechnics got considered the initial cause of fire in the Station club. This is because in the ev ening that this fire broke out pyrotechnic devices referred to as garbs are the ones, which got activated in the middle of plat form. This latter turned into flames, which spread fast leading to spread of fire allover the place (Duwal 14-18). Following these causes of fire, NFPA codes were modified to curb further deaths that may result from such fires. Some of these changes were as following: NFPA 1126, which stress on use of pyrotechnics and their standards. This code states that pyrotechnics, as well as open flame devices, are not to be used assembly occupancy places. It says that if they have to be used then they have to compile with standards set out in NFPA 1126. There is also need to ensure no ignition occurs of every combustible substance. Every assembly place was required to ensure there is a main exit and entrance. This exit and entrance will be of width capable to accommodate one- half of the people within the building and should connect to a stairway, which lead to a str eet. New nightclubs were mandated to install fire sprinklers as in the case with assembly occupancies such as dance halls, bars and festival seating according to NFPA 101, 12.3. Building owners are required to have a look at all building egress, make sure there are no obstructions, and keep track of maintenance records of these egresses functioning condition.Advertising Looking for research paper on environmental studies? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More A well-trained crowd manager should be present for all gatherings except the religious gathering. Incase the gathering is large then two managers are required to be present. Crowds exceeding 200 persons should not be provided by chairs. They are supposed to use festival seating whereby they sit on floor unless a life safety evaluation has been approved by the authority concerned. The main entrance and exit for new night clubs was adjusted from one-half to two third of the occup ants inside the nightclub. Other exits and entrances should be able to hold not less than one-half of total occupant loads. These other exits should have access to main entrances and exits. Any decorative materials must be constituent with NFPA requirements and any nightclub willing to decorate its premise must use only decorative materials approved by NFPA. Failure to comply with this will lead to heavy fine and even closure of the nightclub. The clubs doors should always be ajar and open on the outside. Fire alarms should be connected to the nearest fire fighting stations and should be audible enough for all to hear. Nightclub and other building owners should comply with fire prevention measures not only when applying for certificates after construction but at all times. Works Cited Duwal, Robert. â€Å"NFPA Case Study: Nightclub Fires.† NFPA Journal (2006): 14-18. Print. This research paper on The Station Nightclub Fire was written and submitted by user Brian Neal to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Free Essays on Eleanor Maccaoby

Eleanor Maccoby is a renowned psychologist, with publications dating from 1957 to today. She specializes on the socialization of children, developmental change in personality and behavior, relationships of couples after divorce, and parent-child interactions. In this review I focus on her work examining the socialization of children, and parent-child interactions. I link her work between the socialization of children, from their interactions with their parents and with other children, to the interactions of adults. There is a clear parallel between the sex-typed skills learned in child-interactions and those conveyed in adult interactions. Parent–Child Interactions Maccoby looks at the development of gender through interaction: â€Å"social behavior is never a function of the individual alone. It is the function of the interaction between two or more persons† (Maccoby 1990). Maccoby’s earlier work dealt with parental effects on children’s gender identity, focusing on the sex stereotypes that parents instill in their children through interaction. Rothbart and Maccoby (1966) studied parents’ reactions to specific child behaviors, especially those regarded as sex-typed, like dependency and aggression, in hopes of understanding what accounts for sex differences in behavior. Social-learning theory addresses the finding, that girls display more dependent behaviors than boys, and boys display more aggressive behaviors than girls. And that dependent behaviors are less rewarded for males, just as aggressive behaviors are less rewarded for females (Rothbart and Maccoby 1966). Using social-learning theory, and assuming that the family constitutes the â€Å"culture† into which a young child is exposed, Rothbart and Maccoby (1966) predicted that both parents would reinforce dependency more strongly in girls, and aggression more strongly in boys. Rothbart Maccoby (1966) tested their prediction by placing parents in a hypotheti... Free Essays on Eleanor Maccaoby Free Essays on Eleanor Maccaoby Eleanor Maccoby is a renowned psychologist, with publications dating from 1957 to today. She specializes on the socialization of children, developmental change in personality and behavior, relationships of couples after divorce, and parent-child interactions. In this review I focus on her work examining the socialization of children, and parent-child interactions. I link her work between the socialization of children, from their interactions with their parents and with other children, to the interactions of adults. There is a clear parallel between the sex-typed skills learned in child-interactions and those conveyed in adult interactions. Parent–Child Interactions Maccoby looks at the development of gender through interaction: â€Å"social behavior is never a function of the individual alone. It is the function of the interaction between two or more persons† (Maccoby 1990). Maccoby’s earlier work dealt with parental effects on children’s gender identity, focusing on the sex stereotypes that parents instill in their children through interaction. Rothbart and Maccoby (1966) studied parents’ reactions to specific child behaviors, especially those regarded as sex-typed, like dependency and aggression, in hopes of understanding what accounts for sex differences in behavior. Social-learning theory addresses the finding, that girls display more dependent behaviors than boys, and boys display more aggressive behaviors than girls. And that dependent behaviors are less rewarded for males, just as aggressive behaviors are less rewarded for females (Rothbart and Maccoby 1966). Using social-learning theory, and assuming that the family constitutes the â€Å"culture† into which a young child is exposed, Rothbart and Maccoby (1966) predicted that both parents would reinforce dependency more strongly in girls, and aggression more strongly in boys. Rothbart Maccoby (1966) tested their prediction by placing parents in a hypotheti...

The History of Corinthian Columns

The History of Corinthian Columns The word Corinthian describes an ornate column style developed in ancient Greece and classified as one of the Classical Orders of Architecture. The Corinthian style is more complex and elaborate than the earlier Doric and Ionic Orders. The capital or top part of a Corinthian style column has lavish ornamentation carved to resemble leaves and flowers. Roman architect Vitruvius observed that the delicate Corinthian design was produced out of the two other orders. He described the Corinthian column as an imitation of the slenderness of a maiden; for the outlines and limbs of maidens, being more slender on account of their tender years, admit of prettier effects in the way of adornment. Because of their opulence, Corinthian columns are rarely used as common porch columns for the ordinary home. The style is more suited for Greek Revival mansions and public architecture such as government buildings, especially courthouses. Characteristics of Corinthian columns include: Fluted (grooved) shaftsCapitals (the tops of each shaft) decorated with  acanthus leaves and flowers and sometimes small scrollsCapital ornaments that flare outward like bells, suggesting a sense of heightProportion; Vitruvius tells us that the height of their capitals gives them proportionately a taller and more slender effect than Ionic columns Why Are They Called Corinthian Columns? In the worlds first architecture textbook, De architectura (30 B.C.), Vitruvius tells the story of a young girl from the city-state of Corinth. A free-born maiden of Corinth, just of marriageable age, was attacked by an illness and passed away, writes Vitruvius. She was buried with a basket of her favorite things atop her tomb, near the root of an acanthus tree. That spring, leaves and stalks grew up through the basket, creating a delicate explosion of natural beauty. The effect caught the eye of a passing sculptor named Callimachus, who began to incorporate the intricate design onto column capitals. Because the sculptor found this design in Corinth, the columns that bear it became known as Corinthian columns. West of Corinth in Greece is the Temple of Apollo Epicurius at Bassae, thought to be the oldest surviving example of the Classical Corinthian column. This temple from about 425 B.C. is a UNESCO World Heritage site. The Tholos (a round building) at Epidauros (c. 350 B.C.) is thought to be one of the first structures to use a colonnade of Corinthian columns. Archaeologists have determined the tholos to have 26 exterior Doric columns and 14 interior Corinthian columns. The Temple of Olympian Zeus (175 B.C.) in Athens is said to have had more than 100 Corinthian columns. Are All Corinthian Capitals the Same? No, not all Corinthian capitals are exactly alike, but they are characterized by their leafy flowers. The capitals of Corinthian columns are more ornamented and delicate than the tops of other column types. They can easily deteriorate over time, especially when they are used outdoors. Early Corinthian columns were used primarily for interiors spaces, and thus were protected from the elements. The Monument of Lysikrates (c. 335 B.C.) in Athens features some of the earliest examples of exterior Corinthian columns. Replacing deteriorated Corinthian capitals must be done by master craftsmen. During the 1945 bombing of Berlin, the royal palace was heavily damaged, and it was later demolished in the 1950s. With the reunification of East and West Berlin, the palace was reinvented. Sculptors used old photographs to recreate the architectural details in the new facade, in clay and in plaster, noting that not all of the Corinthian capitals were the same. Architectural Styles That Use Corinthian Columns The Corinthian column and the Corinthian Order were created in ancient Greece. Ancient Greek and Roman architecture is collectively known as Classical, and so Corinthian columns are found in Classical architecture. The Arch of Constantine (A.D. 315) in Rome and the Ancient Library of Celsus in Ephesus feature examples of Corinthian columns in Classical architecture. Classical architecture was reborn during the Renaissance in the 15th and 16th centuries. Later derivatives of Classical architecture include the Neoclassical, Greek Revival, and Neoclassical Revival architectures of the 19th century, and the Beaux Arts architecture of the American Gilded Age. Thomas Jefferson was influential in bringing the Neoclassical style to America, as seen in the Rotunda at The University of Virginia in Charlottesville. Corinthian-like designs can also be found in some Islamic architecture. The distinctive capital of the Corinthian column comes in many forms, but the acanthus leaf appears in most designs. Professor Talbot Hamlin suggests that Islamic architecture was influenced by the acanthus leaf design: Many mosques, like those at Kairouan and Cordova, used actual ancient Corinthian capitals; and later Moslem capitals were often based on the Corinthian scheme in general pattern, although the tendency toward abstraction gradually removed all remaining signs of realism from the carving of the leaves. Famous Buildings With Corinthian Columns In the United States, famous buildings with Corinthian columns include the U.S. Supreme Court Building, the U.S. Capitol, and the National Archives Building, all of which are in Washington, D.C. In New York City, buildings with these columns include the New York Stock Exchange Building on Broad Street in Lower Manhattan and the James A. Farley Building, which is across the street from Penn Station and Madison Square Garden. In Rome, check out the Pantheon and the Colosseum, where Doric columns are on the first level, Ionic columns on the second, and Corinthian columns on the third. Great Renaissance cathedrals throughout Europe are apt to show off their Corinthian columns, including St. Pauls Cathedral and St Martin-in-the-Fields in London.

Orgnistionl context of PEPSI INC Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Orgnistionl context of PEPSI INC - Assignment Example Stakeholders are generally defined as any individuals or organizations who have the ability to directly or indirectly affect or are affected by the operations of a program. (Wnous, Reichers, Mlik, 2004) In Pepsi Inc there are two main distinctions concerning the type of stakeholder: internal and external. Internal stakeholders are typically all employees, and might include specific groups such as agency managers; program managers; front-line supervisors; direct-service employees; subject matter experts or occupational specialists; and evaluation, planning, and budgeting staff. External stakeholders are individuals or groups outside the organization that regularly exercise actions that can promote, inhibit, or change the operations of the organization. Types of external stakeholders who might participate include: elected officials, interest groups, union representatives, the media, customers, and citizens. Powerful externl stkeholders re cpble of dominting n orgnistion's strtegy. It i s importnt to scertin ech stkeholder's level of interest concerning the orgnistionl purposes nd strtegic choices, nd the level of power they yield. Implementing stkeholder mpping mtrix provides n insight into this, which in turn fcilittes the understnding of Pepsi Inc's politicl priorities. 4. Corporte strtegy Pepsi Inc brnd nmes re mong the best-known nd most respected in the world. Some of the Pepsi Inc brnd nmes re 100 yers old, but the corportion is reltively young. Pepsi Inc. ws founded in 1965 through the merger of Pepsi-Col nd Frito-Ly. Tropicn ws cquired in 1998. In 2001, Pepsi Inc merged with the Quker Ots Compny, creting the world's fifth-lrgest food nd beverge compny, with 15 brnds - ech generting more thn $1 billion in nnul retil sles. The success of PepsiCo is the result of superior products, high stndrds of performnce, distinctive competitive strtegies nd the high level of integrity of our people. Compny's overriding objective is to increse the vlue of our shreholders' investment through integrted operting, investing nd finncing ctivities. Pepsi's strtegy is to concentrte our resources on growing our businesses, both through internl growth nd crefully selected cquisitions. Corporte strtegy is continully fine-tuned to ddress the opportunities nd risks of the globl mrketplce. T he corportion's success reflects our continuing commitment to growth nd focus on those businesses where we cn drive our own growth nd crete opportunities. Pepsi's Keys of Corporte Governnce nd Business Ethics: strong record of community support nd corporte citizenship, contributing through The PepsiCo Foundtion, which includes grnts to orgniztions, support of employee volunteerism nd mtching gifts. Commitment to culture of inclusion, providing equl opportunity nd workplce where ll employees hve the opportunity to rech their potentil. Commitment to helping employees blnce their work nd home lives. Cultivtion diverse supplier bse, purchsing growing percentge of our products from minority- nd women-owned firms. Striving to develop

The relationship between unequal democracy and uneasy alliances Essay

The relationship between unequal democracy and uneasy alliances - Essay Example Scholars argue that politicians respond to the needs of all voters because of their desire to win elections. Paul contradicts this view by expounding on the economic gap that politicians create among Americans based on racial and political affiliation. He further explains that American politicians spend a great deal of resources and time on the majority who are white voters, at the expense of the minority black voters. The theory intimates that the two-party system in United States is responsible for the current state of affairs. Frymer argues that the establishment of the current party system distances the American minorities’ concerns from political agendas (Frymer 26). The system continues to limit opportunities for black Americans politically. Several American presidents facilitate this political isolation by distancing themselves from the needs of the African Americans. In addition, the Republican Party, which dominates most of the white populace, concentrates on the need s of the white voters. Frymer compares the black voters’ position in the American politics with that of minority social groups such as lesbians, gays and Christian right. According to Frymer, uneasy alliances are powerful challenges on how Americans view the relationship between democracy, black voters and political parties. The theory compares the impact of various political parties on the livelihoods of the black voters. It reveals that the Democratic Party establishes a close relationship with the African-American voters while the Republican Party relates well with the white voters.

Why Did Britain Vote to Leave the EU?

Why Did Britain Vote to Leave the EU? Introduction On the 23rd June 2016, in a nationwide referendum, British voters were asked the question: Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union? After a bitterly fought election campaign, the electorates of Great Britain chose to leave the European Union (EU).. The ballot was extremely close, with 51.9% of the electoral population voting to leave and 48.1% wanting to remain. At 72%, turnout was higher than for any UK-wide vote since the 1992 General Election. The promise of a referendum was first announced by Prime Minister David Cameron on 23rd January 2013. He vowed that if the Conservative Party was elected to power in the General Election of 2015, they would hold a national referendum on the UK’s membership in the EU. After the election was successfully won, the new Conservative Government introduced the European Union Referendum Bill 2015-16. This ensured that the referendum must be held before the end of 2017.In February 2016, regulations set the official date. The referendum campaign was split into two groups. Firstly, there was Britain Stronger in Europe, aiming to persuade the nation that Britain will be stronger and far more successful as an active member of the European Union. On the other hand, there was Vote Leave, led by Gisela Stuart and Michael Gove. This campaign group successfully encouraged 51.9% of the British electorate to vote out, meaning Britain would withdraw its membership with the European Union. The Chief Counting Officer, Jenny Watson, who is the Chair of the Electoral Commission, declared the national result from the national referendum count event held in Manchester on Friday 24 June at 07:51 (Uberoi, 2016, p4). This result triggered ‘Brexit’. This term became the famous tagline of the referendum result and is an abbreviation of ‘British exit’ out of the European Union. Through researching the referendum’s result, there was limited analytic material on why 51.9% of the British electorate decided to vote to leave the EU. The majority of the literature focused on the consequences of Brexit and the immediate impact it had on Britain. Hence, this triggered interest regarding the question why did Britain decide to support Vote Leave. The purpose of my study is to analyse why the referendum on the 23rd June 2016, resulted in a decision for Britain to leave the European Union. The analysis will be split into three fundamental chapters. Firstly, who voted for Brexit, examining the social and geographical aspects of voting to leave. Secondly, examining what the main reasons were for wanting the UK to withdraw from the European Union, including motives such as controlling immigration and regaining national identity. Lastly, exploring why Vote Leave won. This involves analysing the effects of electoral turnout and other factors such as, the support of the national press and the actions of the campaigns figurehead politicians. The objective of this research is to come to an assertive conclusion on what the most important reasons were 51.9% of the electorate that voted on the 23rd June 2016 wanted to leave the European and factors that contributed to why Vote Leave won. Reliable research needs to be developed to analyse why 51.9% of voters wanted to leave the EU, and only then can it be understood what people want from the result. Literature Review Recognising why Britain decided to vote to leave the European Union in the 2016 referendum is important because it is essential to understand what changes in politics the British electorate want. It is imperative to analyse who voted to leave the EU and reasons behind this choice. As soon as the referendum results were announced, masses of data was evaluated showing how the electorate voted, significantly regarding geographical areas and social class. This included polls from sources such as Lord Ashcroft, which was used by many of the national newspapers. Other sources such as YouGov, further support this data by getting similar results in polls they also ran. However, there is a gap in the theoretical data, as there is limited material questioning the empirical reasons why the British electorate voted leave and why the Vote Leave campaign won. Furthermore, the information being produced regarding the referendum quickly moved onto the consequences of voting to leave the European Union. Thus, why it is important research is developed regarding why the 2016 Referendum resulted in a vote for Britain leaving the European Union, as the current observations are limited. As it is an extremely current topic, thorough analysis is still being developed, therefore the limitations in the research are understood.      Who voted for Brexit In order to analyse the reasons why 51.9% of the British voting population wanted to leave the European Union, it is important to recognise who exactly voted this way in June 2016. Within hours of the result being confirmed, there was significant amounts of data being produced regarding how the public voted. Most this information was made public through newspaper articles. The Daily Mail and The Guardian, both produced articles showing the full results of analysis of the EU referendum results. This allowed the reader to see how each constituency voted and then further breaks down the data into significant topics such as age, education and annual income. The resemblances between the two newspapers analysis indicates that the examination of the data must be based on fact and the papers different political bias is not reflected within the analysis, therefore demonstrating the sources credible. Most of the national press gained their EU referendum results data from YouGov or Lord Ashcroft’s Poll. YouGov is an internet-based market research firm and their methodology involves obtaining responses from an invited group of internet users, and then weighting these responses in line with demographic information. This organisation similarly splits its analysis of the EU results into socio-economic groups, however the go further by also including factors such as ‘political attention’. YouGov has claimed that its opinion polls are most precise when compared to its opponents and that its online approach is more accurate than traditional polling methods (YouGov, n.d.). However, not every member of the voting population has access to the internet and internet polls could be argued as mainly aimed at the younger generation. Therefore, it is claimed online samples cannot accurately reflect the views of the population. On the other hand, Lord Ashcroft Poll conducted a survey, online and by telephone, after voters can casted their vote (Ashcroft, 2016). The additional method of telephone surveying adds reliability to the results. This is because most people have access to a telephone, increasing representativeness. Furthermore, as the results were collected on the same day people had voted, their opinions and thoughts about the referendum were still fresh. Thus, concluding Lord Ashcroft’s poll as more credible. Overall, the literature regarding who voted for Brexit, significantly shows a trend concerning which socio-economic groups are thought to be the most important to analyse. This includes age, levels of education and annual income. On the other hand, the literature didn’t indicate the significance of other social groups, for example different types of trade and ethnicity. Hence why my analysis will look further into these different issues.   Reasons for Voting to Leave It is important to understand why 51.9% of the British voting population voted to leave the European Union on the 23rd June 2016. Lord Ashcroft poll’s state that the three most important reasons for people choosing Vote Leave were;   The principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK.Voting to the leave offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.Remaining meant little or no choice about how the EU expanded its membership or powers. These three reasons were also the top three reasons for Conservative and Labour voters, showing that the explanations are not completely politically swayed (Ashcroft, 2016). Consequentially, it is clear that Lord Ashcroft concludes the main argument for voting to leave was the want to regain control over choices that impacted Great Britain. This is also reflected in Clarke, Goodwin and Whiteley’s research paper ‘Why Britain Voted for Brexit’. National identity and sovereignty is key in their research to find out why Britain voted to leave. However, their research is extremely strengthened by their used of models and equations to further prove the impact of factors such as ‘explanatory powers’ and ‘predictor variables’ (Clarke, Goodwin and Whiteley, 2016, p16). The combined use of polling and mathematical models, reinforces the credibility of their results.   National newspapers are argued to be the most significant source of information that influenced people’s vote. The Sun and the Daily Mail were dominant Vote Leave supporters, stating immigration and taking back control of the United Kingdom as their most important reasons for why Britain should leave the European Union. This could have significantly influenced certain socio-economic groups vote, considerably less academic people, who are the tabloid newspapers majority readers. However, the bias nature of national newspapers, decreases their credibility. The political opinions expressed by these newspapers regarding why Britain voted to leave the European Union are not totally reliable, due to their expressed support of the Leave Campaign. This is where a gap is research is demonstrated. It has proven difficult to find previous credible research to why specific groups, such as older people and low income households, decided to vote to leave the European Union.   Why did Vote Leave Win? Certain literature does recognise the importance of factors allowing Vote Leave to win, such as the impact of voter turnout. There has been substantial debate regarding the relationship between turnout and age. The House of Commons EU Referendum Briefing paper argues that ‘there was no significant relationship between higher turnout levels and higher levels of support for leave’ (Uberoi, 2016, p26). However, The Telegraph recognise that there was an important trend between age and voter turnout (Kirk and Dunford, 2016). Older voters had a high percentage turnout, compared to young voters. As strong Vote Leave supporters, the high turnout level for the over sixty-fives is argued to have given Brexit a greater chance to win. Furthermore, as a result of poor turnout levels from young people, who were strong Remain supports, this is argued to have reduced the Remain campaign’s chance at winning. Therefore, denouncing The House of Commons EU Referendum Briefing paper argument that the trend between age and turnout was weak. Conclusions Due to the lack of research, analysing which are the most important factors that resulted in a vote for Britain to leave the European Union, it is important further studies are developed. Furthermore, due to much of the accessible materials being newspaper articles, the credibility of the information available is weak. This is due to the significant political biasness of the national press. Substantial amounts of data about who voted for Brexit was released in under 24 hours of the result being confirmed. However, research regarding what reasons voters had for voting to leave and why the Leave campaign won, has been proven hard to find. Moreover, as the issue of ‘why the result of the 2016 referendum resulted in a vote for Britain to leave the European Union’ is still recent, it is important to recognise that data is still being analysed.   Who voted for Brexit? It is important to firstly outline who in the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. Throughout the campaign, it was clear that particular social groups would be strong Vote Leave supporters, such as older citizens and people who work in certain trades such as the fishing industry. However, as the results came in on the night of 23 June 2016, votes to leave had higher shares than expected. This chapter will give a focused quantitative analysis regarding who voted to leave the European Union in June 2016. The study will focus on core demographics such as age, gender and ethnicity. Furthermore, it is important to look at how education and party allegiance impacted on people’s decision to vote the leave the EU. A breakdown of how the regions within the United Kingdom will also be conducted, analysing if geographical differences presented a relationship with voters’ decisions.   A later chapter will build on the following considerations, examining why people voted in this manner. Regions The United Kingdom became a divided nation when the results began to come in on the night of 23 June 2016. The earliest returns, from Newcastle and Sunderland, showed higher shares for leave than had been anticipated. The trend persisted – Scotland, Northern Ireland and London were the only three regions in which a majority voted to remain – and by four oclock in the morning the broadcasters were ready to announce that the country had voted for Brexit (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p166). The vote to Remain in Scotland was considerably higher than anywhere else, at 62% of the vote. However, in England and Wales the vote to Leave won, with England having the highest percentage of support for the Vote Leave campaign, but still very narrow at 53.2%. Nine out of the twelve regions of the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. The large Brexit votes in the North of England were the first signals of what was to come in the referendum. In the North East, 58% of voters supported leaving the EU. According to the Daily Telegraph, more than one in three people along the coast north of Hartlepool regard themselves in the DE social-class in the last census. This can be seen a sign of Leave’s Victory of successfully appealing to working-class voters (Coles, Kirk and Krol, 2016). The most Eurosceptic part of the United Kingdom was the West Midlands, totalling the highest percentage vote to leave, at 59.2%. UKIP did not gain a significant foothold in the General Election, so Vote Leave might have been surprised that the electorate of the West Midlands strongly voted out of the EU. The only region in England to vote Remain was London. The cosmopolitan city had polled as the most Europhilic part of England before the referendum. Furthermore, it is home to the financial City of London, whose businesses and banks had mainly backed the professed stability of voting to remain. Thus, the result of 59.9% of the London electorate voting to stay in the European Union was expected. However, this result left the Capital city surrounded by pro-Brexit regional neighbours (Coles, Kirk and Krol, 2016) Percentage of Votes to Leave (Swales, 2016, p9) Age A strong Vote Leave supporter from the beginning of the campaign was voters over the age of 65. According to statistics 60% of over 65 year olds voted to leave the European Union. This is closely followed by over 56% of 45 to 64 year olds also coming to the decision the United Kingdom is better out of the EU (Ashcroft, 2016). The Daily Telegraph provides further analysis showing that the East coast areas that scored the highest anti-EU  votes were also the areas with the highest pensioner populace. Just two of the top 30 areas for over 65s voted to Remain South Lakeland in the North West and South Hams in the South West (Boult, 2016). This is supported by Ashcroft and Culwick’s findings, showing that â€Å"more than half of those on a private pension voted to leave, as did two thirds of those retired with only a state pension† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p167). By contrast, the younger generations of Britain have a contrasting view. Statistics show that 73% of 18 to 24 year olds voted to remain (Ashcroft, 2016). The Sun newspaper called this divide â€Å"The Generation Gap†, analysing how age significantly showed a trend in how different people voted in the referendum. The age divide is shown clearly by Ashcroft and Culwick’s discovery that â€Å"most of those with children aged ten or under voted to remain; most of those whose children were aged eleven or older voted to leave† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p167). This illustrates how there was a clear correlation between the age of voters and their decision to vote ‘Remain’ or ‘Leave’ in the 2016 Referendum. It is evident that the older the voter is, the more likely they would have voted to leave the European Union, even though some of them won’t live long enough to experience the consequences. Education Recent findings show that people with fewer qualifications and lower standards of education, were more likely to have voted to leave the European Union. The tables in the European Union Referendum Briefing paper clearly show that there is obvious correlation between the number of non-graduates and the percentage of people who voted to leave. The opposite is reciprocated on the graph regarding graduates, showing strong correspondence between holding a degree and voting to remain (Uberoi, 2016, p21). This evidence is parallel with Lord Ashcroft’s findings, stating â€Å"a majority (57%) of those with a university degree voted to remain, as did 64% of those with a higher degree†¦Among those whose formal education ended at secondary school or earlier, a large majority voted to leave† (Ashcroft, 2016). Therefore, it is evident that voters with fewer qualifications voted to enforce Brexit. (Uberoi, 2016, p21) Social Class (Uberoi, 2016, p22). The clear relationship between level of education and voting to leave the European Union is very closely linked to the similar correlation regarding social classes and level of income. â€Å"Professionals and managers (often described as the ‘ABs’) were the only social group among which a majority (57%) voted to remain†, stated Ashcroft and Culwick. However, â€Å"nearly two thirds of skilled manual workers (‘C2s’), and of unskilled manual workers and those dependent on state benefits, voted for Brexit† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p168). In contrast to this, the Commons Library Briefing Paper argues there is little correlation between socio-economic indicators and the proportion of people voting to leave. There is an arguably weaker relationship between the median weekly earning in local authorities and the amount of people voting to leave. Furthermore, there is no obvious correlation between the rank of a local authority in terms of deprivation and vote shares to leave. (Uberoi, 2016, p22). Therefore, this suggests that votes for Leave and Remain are not as strongly related to social class as initially thought. However, considering various information, it is evident that there is a correlation between social class and people’s opinions regarding the EU referendum. Thus, voters in lower social classes were more likely to have voted to leave the European Union. Industries Certain trades, such as the fishing industry, were huge supporters of the Vote Leave campaign. When the United Kingdom joined what became the European Union, fishermen’s quotas and rights were cut dramatically, causing a steady decline of the industry’s previous success. Many of the current quotas give large shares of catches to other fishermen within the EU. Thus, when the opportunity came to have an impact on the UK’s decision on its EU membership, fishermen became a key touchstone for Brexit. It is argued that they voted Leave to give the industry a chance to regain control. However, there is some argument over whether it will be as beneficial for fishermen as the leave campaign promised. Because pursuing Article 50 could take years, the UK is still a member of the EU. Furthermore, if new arrangements are negotiated after Brexit, they may not be necessarily more generous as the fishing industry will still be tied to international agreements. However, due to the attractive opportunity arising to regain control, the fishing industry was a strong supporter of leaving the EU. Furthermore, many post industrial areas of the UK, that receive a lot of EU funding, had a greater support for Brexit than initially expected. For example, the Valleys in South Wales are historically industrial and strong Labour supporters, so it was assumed they were secure remain enthusiasts. Thus, it came as a shock when these strongholds voted in favour of Brexit, with areas such as Neath Port Talbot and Caerphilly voting to leave by over 56%. Therefore, it is evident that industrial areas weren’t as supportive of the EU as originally thought. Ethnicity Lord Ashcroft’s poll conducted on the day of the referendum found significant correlation between a vote to Leave the European Union and a voter’s ethnicity and religion. It is argued that 53% of White voters supported the decision to withdraw the United Kingdom’s membership with the EU. This was the only ethnicity group to have a majority backing for the Vote Leave campaign. Other ethnicities such as, Mixed, Asian or Black, their amount of votes to Leave did not go higher than 33% (Ashcroft, 2016). This shows that people with White ethnicity were more likely to have voted for Brexit, but only by a narrow majority. Furthermore, it can be argued that there is a relationship between ethnicity and national identity. People from ethnic minorities are more likely to identify as ‘British only’, while white respondents are more likely to identify as ‘English only’ according to the 2011 Census. The tables from the Electoral Commission show that English local authorities with higher proportions of people who gave their national identity as ‘British only’ in the 2011 Census were more likely to record lower vote shares for Leave. (Uberoi, 2016) English local authorities with higher proportions of people who classified their national identity as ‘English only’ were more likely to record higher vote shares for Leave (Uberoi, 2016). This tells us that white voters were more likely to have voted for Brexit, and it could be explained due to their views regarding national identity. Regarding religion, support for Brexit is more mixed. Christians were found to have the highest percentage vote to leave the European Union, with the greatest majority at 58%. This is followed by 54% of the Jewish electorate and 52% of Sikh’s also voting for the decision to leave. This was in stark contrast to other religions, such as Muslim or Hindu, whose support to leave did not go above 30% (Ashcroft, 2016). Party Allegiance It is important to analyse who voted for Brexit through the perspective of party allegiance. Many political parties were divided over the question, â€Å"Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?†, with UKIP being one of the only significant parties providing a united front on the issue. For example, 58% of those who voted Conservative in the 2015 General Election voted to leave the EU. While 63% of the Opposition Party Labour supporters voted to remain in the EU, as did seven out of ten Liberal Democrats and 75% of Green voters. Conservative voters constituted just over three out of every ten Remain supporters, and four in ten leavers. Labour voters made up four in every ten Remain supporters, and two in ten leavers. Scottish National Party voters backed the Remain campaign by nearly two to one, with 64% voting for the United Kingdom to remain within the EU (Ashcroft, 2016). Ashcroft and Culwick analyse this result further stating, â€Å"since Scotland’s First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, would use Scotland’s support for EU membership as the basis to seek a second referendum on Scottish independence, nearly half (44%) of Scottish support for Brexit came from her own SNP supporters† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p169).   UKIP was the only party with a significant majority, with 96% of people who voted for them in the 2015 General Election voting to leave the European Union. Therefore, regarding party allegiance, the picture was quite mixed. However, Conservative supporters were more likely to vote to leave and without a need for explanation, UKIP enthusiasts were solid supporters of Brexit. Was there a Vote Leave Stereotype? Throughout the referendum campaign, it could be argued that there was a stereotype created regarding the type of person that would have voted to leave the European Union. Whilst there was no gender gap, the issue divides the population according to age, political learnings and education as the key deciding issues. A significant event that portrayed the use of stereotypes during the referendum was the publication of the Operation Black Vote poster. The poster was created to encourage black people to vote, however many condemned the Saatchi and Saatchi devised image of an Asian woman balanced on a see-saw with a shaven-headed white man, which was portrayed as a ‘thug’. It creates an implication that all Brexit voters are of white ethnicity, who do not welcome ethnic minorities, thus some would argue encouraging sectarian politics. The London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, expressed his concern over the image due to it reinforcing stereotypes (Proto, 2016). This is significant because he was a Britain Stronger in Europe campaign supporter, who is also from an ethnic minority in Britain. Therefore, there is strong evidence to support the argument that there was a stereotype created around who voted for Brexit. From the research conducted, the most significant perceptions can be concluded as white ethnicity, older and of lower education. What are the reasons for voting to leave the EU? Building from the previous considerations regarding who voted for Brexit, it is important is understand what reasons voters had for wanting to leave the European Union. A focal point for the Vote Leave campaign was the amount of money the United Kingdom contributed to the EU. They claimed the UK pays  £350 million a week into the EU budget and implied it could be spent on the NHS instead. This shocked many voters and it could be argued the claim helped swing the vote towards Brexit. Other key arguments supporting the decision to vote to leave the European Union are that decisions about the UK should be made in the UK, control over immigration and the fear that remaining in the EU meant little choice about how the EU can expand its powers. These reasons were the top three most important reasons for people who voted to leave the EU according to Lord Ashcroft’s Poll (Ashcroft, 2016). This chapter will analyse the reasons why 51.9% of the electorate who voted in the 2016 referendum wanted to leave the European Union. National Identity and Sovereignty National identity was a key issue causing many voters to choose to support Brexit and the freedom for Britain to run its own affairs was at the centre of the leave campaign. This was established in its slogan, ‘Vote Leave, Take Control’. A pre-referendum survey found that 51% of people indicated that they thought EU membership eroded British sovereignty (Clarke, Goodwin and Whitely, 2016, p12). This relates to Lord Ashcroft’s findings that the most important reasons for voting Leave was the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK (Ashcroft, 2016). Britain has a particular notion of sovereignty enshrined in one intuition, rather than shared among several. When what was then known as the European Economic Community was created in 1957, its aim was to avoid another destructive war in Europe by making its countries economically interdependent. However, what began as a purely monetary union has now expanded and become accountable for many different areas of policy, from agriculture to transport. When arranging the deal regarding the UK’s membership with the EEC, then Prime Minister, Edward Heath promised that â€Å"there is no question of any erosion of essential national sovereignty†. However, The Economist argues this is only true in the sense that Parliament can repeal the 1972 European Communities Act, ignoring the reality that EU membership meant that European Law undermines national law (The Economist, 2016). This could explain why the older generation were strong Vote Leave supporters, as they remember the times before the UK became a member of the EU. It is argued that before the UK joined the EU they were considered a significant global power, and since then their impact has declined. On the other hand, Britain is signed up to over 700 international treaties that encroach on sovereignty. Although the EU has the greatest impact, others are also significant, such as NATO. However, as Lord Ashcroft found, Brexit was successful because of people’s fear that remaining in the EU meant little choice about how it expanded its powers and encroached upon British sovereignty (Ashcroft, 2016). The British Election Study Team argue that Vote Leave’s slogan, ‘Vote Leave, Take Control’, had a more significant impact on some people’s lives than originally thought, due to it affecting their ‘locus of control’ (Election Study Team, 2016). It represents the extent that people think they are in control over what happens to them. ‘People with an internal locus of control think they are themselves largely responsible for the things that happen to them, whilst those with an external locus of control tend to believe things are controlled by outside forces they cannot influence, such as other people, fate, or chance’, (Election Study Team, 2016). Their research helps explain people’s attitudes regarding losing their national identity and sovereignty. Those with an external locus of control are more likely to blame others, such as immigrants, for any hardship they may come by. They found that those with an external locus of con trol were much more likely to vote Leave (and take control) than those with an internal locus of control, as shown in the graph (Election Study Team, 2016). Thus concluding national identity had a significant impact on deciding to vote Leave. (Election Study Team, 2016) Immigration It is argued that national identity is further threatened by the issue of immigration. This was made a defining issue by the Vote Leave campaign that fuelled a lot of voter’s passions. Additionally, Lord Ashcroft’s poll declared ‘voting to Leave offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders’ the second most important reason to leave the European Union (Ashcroft, 2016). The issue of immigration became more important when Poland and Romania joined the EU, in 2004 and 2007 respectively. The EU’s principle of the ‘free movement of labour’ made immigration a concern for Britain, fuelled by tabloid reports of migrants taking jobs and driving down wages. EU migrants were often blamed for exacerbating public services, such as NHS waiting lists. These claims were increased significantly in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis; the subsequent austerity, involving cuts in public spending and thus cuts in public services, led to even more blame and hostility towards EU migrant workers. This was significantly felt amongst older people and those living in poorer areas. (Clarke, Goodwin and Whitely, 2016, p31) Further events helped the leave campaign in their efforts to gain support. Oxford University’s Migration Observatory reported that the Eurozone crisis of 2015 was encouraging more southern European migrants to travel to the UK than ever before, joining those from Eastern Europe (University of Oxford, 2016). Furthermore, the Office of National Statistics published figures stating that 1.2 million more EU migrants have been given National Insurance numbers in the last five years than had shown up in the immigration figures. Vote Leave used these examples to show how the UK had lost control of its immigration system, allowing for immigration to become one of the most significant explanatory powers in the likelihood of voting Leave. Clarke, Goodwin and Whitely calculated that as benefit-cost calculations regarding immigration moved from negative to positive, the likelihood of voting Leave increased by 0.75 points (on a 0-1 scale) (Clarke, Goodwin and Whitely, 2016, p17). Immigration had the second strongest effect on the electorate’s vote in the referendum. This aligns with Lord Ashcroft’s poll, where immigration was also said to be the second most important reason for voting Leave (Ashcroft, 2016). Ashcroft and Culwick found that immigration was a constant concern amongst the undecided voters in the focus groups they conducted. They found that the worry for many concentrated around competition for school places and public services. A member of the group stated â€Å"Yesterday, my boss, when her child didn’t get into the school she wanted, she said, ‘That’s it, I’m out.’† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p125). Due to increased UK population, it is argued that it is becoming increasingly competitive to get children into schools and difficult to use public services, such as booking appointments to see your GP. The increased pressure on public services is suggested to be decreasing its quality, which many would blame on immigration and more specifically the open door policy of the EU. This is important to the argument to why people no longer wanted to be a member of the European Union. Other events that helped the leave campaign make immigration a successful focus point of encouraging people to vote for Brexit, was the suggestion that Turkey was about to join the EU. Thus, increasing the European Union’s population and therefore the number eligible to come into the U.K. In focus groups, Ashcroft and Culwick found that some had the impression that Turkish membership was impending and were concerned, stating â€Å"The immigration thing will explode. If we stay in and Turkey joins the EU, there are millions of Turks who want to come to the UK. It really worries me. Will they have jobs? Will they have their own money? Will they have private health care?† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p127). This worry links to the previous point about added strain to public services, showing that is a significant concern for people. Due to its importance, it is possible it may have swayed the undecided voters in the focus group to vote to Leave. In a survey I conducted in March 2017, I found that 64% of people believed that immigration had become a bigger issue in the UK since 2015, when David Cameron announced the EU referendum. Furthermore, 40% of respondents felt that immigration had had a negative/extremely negative impact on terrorism, which could have been higher if the survey was conducted a few days later, when the Westminster attack took place. Finally, 66% of respondents did not want immigration to increase, proving that most people want more control over immigration. (Questionnaire information available in appendix). Costs of EU Membership A key focal point of the Vote Leave campaign was their calculation that the UK sent  £350 million a week to the European Union and the country did not receive an equal amount back, thus they argued the costs of being a member outweighed the benefits. If the UK left the EU, it is believed that billions of pounds would become available for other priorities, causing many people to support Brexit. Furthermore, leaving the EU would give the UK government the power to decide where to spend the money. The Vote Leave campaign websites states, ‘We can spend our money on our priorities like the NHS, schools and housing’.   Relating back to sovereignty, those who believe strongly in their national identity want to be able to spend their money on home grounds, thus causing them to vote Leave. However, the Vote Leave campaign were criticised for their statement that the UK sent the EU  £350 million a week. It is argued this calculation is not true. It ignores the rebate negotiated by Margaret Thatcher, agricultural subsidies and developmental subsidies for poorer areas. This leaves the net contribution of  £161 million a week. Ashcroft and Culwick found in their focus groups that probably because of the controversy, the  £350 million number stuck in voters’ minds and even if they could not remember the specific number, they knew it was still huge. One participant stated, â€Å"It’s the amount it costs that worries me. It is something like ten billion a day? Or is it ten million? Or seven million. Anyway, I was shocked when I heard.† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p133). Thus, the cost of EU membership became an important issue for many voters and Vote Leave were successful in making their point clear and believable, therefore causing many people to vote Leave. Conclusions National identity, immigration and the costs of EU membership are the most significant reasons for why 52% of voters wanted to leave the EU. National identity is an issue that is deep rooted for most and important for older voters due to them understanding how the UK worked before becoming a member of the European Union. Anti-immigration attitudes were fuelled by events such as Romania and Poland joining the EU, followed by the 2008 economic recession. This was especially felt amongst older voters and those living in impoverished towns. Immigration and the costs of EU membership were extremely current issues, that gained a lot of importance during the referendum campaign. They pushed a lot of undecided voters to support Vote Leave. Since the campaigns have ended these issues have had a lot less media attention, thus reducing their significance on public opinion. However, regaining control and national identity will always be significant when processing Brexit. Why did Vote Leave Win? In addition to understanding what reasons voters had for wanting to leave the European Union, it is important to consider other factors as to why Vote Leave was successful. This analysis will broadly discuss issues such as voter turnout and party divisions which were significant to the Leave campaign’s triumph. It will examine why the Vote Leave campaign is considered to have been more effective than the Stronger in Europe campaign, due to the factors of having a clear message and gaining the support of the mainstream press. Turnout A decisive element to why Brexit won was the issue of turnout. The Electoral Commission confirmed that 72.2% of registered voters casted their ballots on the 24th June 2016. This verified a total of 33,568,184 ballot papers counted, narrowly missing the record mark of participation in recent elections, where in the 1992 General Election 33,614,074 people went to the ballot box, accounting for 72.3% of the electorate. According to the NatCen Panel, 54% of those who did not vote in the 2015 General Election voted in the EU referendum. This helps explain why turnout was higher than the most recent General Election, 72.2% compared to 66.1%, due to a surge of ‘new voters’ (Swales, 2016, p19). The British voting population turned out in huge numbers. However, the levels of turnout from specific groups is argued to have had a significant impact on the referendum result. Before the referendum, campaigners for Remain were concerned that the younger generation would cost Britain its future within the EU, due to them not turning out to vote on the day. They were classed as Remains’ most secure voters and these concerns became reality on voting day. Moreover, the impact of the secure Leave campaign supporters, the older generation, assured to turn out in high numbers, significantly effecting why it resulted in a vote for Brexit. The Guardian states, ‘the median age in an area was the strongest predictor of turnout and showed a familiar pattern – the older the median age in an area, the more likely it was to have had a high turnout’ (Elgot, 2016). For example, Eastbourne, which has a median age of 71.5 years old, had a turnout of 74.7%. Conversely, Newham had one of the lowest turnouts and its medium age is much lower at 29. There were early cries after the referendum result was announced that the older voters had betrayed the younger generation, however this was countered by the argument that they did not vote in sufficient numbers. It is a constant trend in UK elections that under 25 year olds have the lowest turnout compared to other age groups. This could be due to low political engagement and a decreasing sense of duty to vote. Recent evidence suggests that more young voters turned out to vote than initially estimated. The new findings based on detailed surveying after the referendum by Opinium and analysed by London School of Economics suggests that turnout levels for 18-24 year olds was significantly higher than the initial figures, as shown in the table below. (Helm, 2016). This contradicts the argument that Brexit was mainly attained through the unconcern of young voters. Therefore, the low turnout of young voters may not be as significant as first thought, however this turnout level is still low in comparison to their findings of turnout levels of over 65s. The Campaigns It is argued that the Vote Leave campaign, further promoted by alternative campaigns such as Leave.EU and Grassroots Out, was much more effective than the Remain campaign. Firstly, they had a very well-defined and stronger message of ‘Take Back Control’. However, Remain failed to create a message to compete with this populist slogan. Their key message was the warnings of economic risks of leaving the EU, but this lacked simplicity and were often dismissed as scare-mongering, therefore failing to move enough voters. The messages that the pubic seemed to most remember were those of the Leave campaign, such as the claim that the UK contributed  £350 million a week to the EU, which could be spent on the NHS and the claim that Turkey was close to joining the EU. Subsequently, establishing that Vote Leave were more successful at portraying their message to the public, hence gaining more votes. An additional factor that allowed the Vote Leave campaign to gain more support was the significant backing of the press, especially the two most read newspapers, The Daily Mail and The Sun. Data from the British Election Study found that some 70% of Sun readers voted Leave in the referendum, followed by 66% of Daily Mail readers. Despite the issues of declining readership and lack of trust in the press, it is argued the press still sets the agenda, ‘Where the newspapers lead on issues, far more trusted broadcasters follow’ (Martinson, 2016). Loughborough University’s centre for research in communication and culture found that subjects that dominated the press often led television news. Thus, explaining why numerous stories about immigration, a key Vote Leave issue, continued unrelenting during the last few weeks of the campaign, whilst those about the economy, a key Remain issue, declined (Martinson, 2016). Furthermore, a report by NatCen interestingly found that regarding the EU referendum vote, people were more likely to follow the position of the newspaper they read, rather than the political party they identified with (Swales, 2016, p27). Due to the support of the most widely read national newspapers, it is argued that this was a significant reason why the Leave campaign gained more votes. The Politicians Throughout the campaign certain figurehead politicians arose, whilst others fell. Vote Leave campaign leaders, such as Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson, created enthusiasm amongst supporters. However, even though the Remain campaign had the support of the Prime Minister and most of Parliament, they failed to connect with voters, especially the Labour Party. The passion amongst the Leave campaign and the lack of within Remain, motivated many voters to go to the polls and vote to leave the EU. A key issue was that the public stopped listening to then Prime Minister, David Cameron. Promising the referendum is argued to have been vital to his success in the 2015 General Election and by putting himself at the front of the Remain campaign, he put his political future at stake. He assured the public of his ability to secure fundamental change in the UK’s relationship with the EU through reforms; thus when he came back after nine months of negotiations with only modest change, it was inevitable his concessions would not persuade many floating voters to give him the benefit of the doubt and vote remain (BBC News, 2016). Furthermore, the populist aspect of the Leave campaign appealed to voters who felt most politicians, including the Prime Minister, where out of touch with the ordinary people. Brexit could be described as a backlash against ‘the establishment’ and those cocooned in their ‘Westminster bubble’. (Swales, 2016, p21) Labour was more united on the issue of UK membership in comparison to the Conservative Party, with only a minority of MPs such as Gisela Stuart supporting Brexit. However, another failure of the Remain campaign was Labour’s inability to connect with its voters. They misjudged the mood of their voters, this was shown by their stronghold constituencies voting to Leave. For example, North East areas such as Sunderland, resulted in a 61% to 39% who voted to Leave. It is argued that Labour was sending mixed messages to the voters, and it is blamed on unpopular leader, Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘lukewarm endorsement of continued EU membership’ (Clarke, Goodwin and Whitely, 2016, p10). NatCen have evidence to support the claim that Labour were sending mixed message and thus people did not know where the party stood regarding EU membership. ‘Just over half of the people thought that Labour MPs mainly backed remain, with a quarter saying they were fairly evenly divided, and nearly two-fifths answering, ‘don’t know’’ (Swales, 2016, p21). Only just over half of Labour supporters knew the actual position of Labour MPs, proving that Labour failed to connect with their voters and thus did not enthuse supporters to vote Remain with them.   The enthusiasm for Vote Leave created by figures such as Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage influenced a lot of people to follow and support their campaign. The Leave campaign was described as more passionate than its Remain opponents, as people such as Nigel Farage had been fighting their whole political career for this outcome. Furthermore, the BBC states ‘the justice secretary brought intellectual heft and strategic nous to the table while the former mayor of London, after a bout of soul-searching, brought star appeal and ability to appeal across the party divide’, regarding Michael Gove and Boris Johnson (BBC News, 2016). This further emphasises the appeal towards the ‘populist’ aspect of the Leave campaign, who were argued to be on the side of ordinary people. Recent models found that the leader image cues provided by Farage and Johnson were influential on emotions about EU membership. ‘Feelings about these two figures moved from negative to positive along the 0-10 ‘likeability’ scale, the probability of voting Leave increased by 0.44 points’ (Clarke, Goodwin and Whitely, 2016, p18). Therefore, likeability of the Leave campaigns figureheads was significant to their success. Changes since 1975 In 1975, the UK electorate was asked ‘Do you think the United Kingdom should stay in the European Community?’ and ‘Yes’ won by 67.2%. In comparison, regarding modern day politics, there are lower levels of deference to mainstream, centrist politicians. As stated above, people are less willing to listen to the political elites, such as the Prime Minister. Explaining why populist figureheads like Boris Johnson were so successful in the campaign, as they appealed to the everyday working class, which were Vote Leave’s strongest supporters. In 1975, new Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher got the Conservative Party enthused about European membership, however the fact that  Cameron was unable to  find a common binding chord within his own party, remains the single largest difference to the 1975 referendum (Acharya, 2016). Previously, the main parties of England were united that we should not leave the Community, further strengthened by the support of the press. Presently, it is argued the coherence and the ability to drive a nation is missing drastically among politicians (Acharya, 2016). This allowed Vote Leave to take advantage, thus allowing them to effectively gain more support than the Stronger in Europe campaign, using their enthusiasm and significant support of the press to motivate more people to go to the polls and vote to leave the European Union. Conclusions Vote Leave won the referendum due to having a more efficient and appealing campaign. They had an engaging slogan, compared to Britain Stronger in Europe and most significantly had the support of the mainstream press. Their campaign leaders became very popular, whilst Remain struggled to get people to listen and remember what they were saying. The Remain campaign was further weakened by the disunity of the Labour party, and thus failed to understand the mood of many Labour voters. This allowed the Leave campaign to gain the support of the ‘ordinary man’, and increased the ‘populist’ aspect of their campaign.    An important factor contributing to their success was turnout. Due to older people turning out in high numbers and younger people not going to the polls, it gave Leave an advantage. As the result was so close, 48% to 52%, if more younger people voted, Vote Leave may not have been successful. However, due to recent polls, such as Opinium, turnout may not have been as a significant factor as first thought. Conclusion Why did the 2016 Referendum result in a vote for Britain leaving the EU? The objective of this research was to come to an assertive conclusion on what the most important reasons were 51.9% of the electorate that voted on the 23rd June 2016 wanted to leave the European and understand factors that contributed to why Vote Leave won. This was done through examining who voted for Brexit, what are the reasons for voting to leave the EU and why did Vote Leave win? By answering these key questions, I have come to the following conclusions. According to the research, England was the most Eurosceptic country of the United Kingdom, where the only region who voted to remain in the European Union was London. The more deprived areas of the country were more likely to support Brexit, contributing to the fact that those with fewer qualifications and â€Å"nearly two thirds of skilled manual workers (‘C2s’), and of unskilled manual workers and those dependent on state benefits, voted for Brexit† (Ashcroft and Culwick, 2016, p168). A voter’s age, ethnicity and party allegiance significantly showed a trend in Vote Leave support. Over 65s were a constant supporter of Leave throughout the campaign. Furthermore, people with White ethnicity and Conservative supporters were more likely to have voted for Brexit. As a consequence, there was a stereotype created around who voted for Brexit. From the research conducted, the most significant perceptions can be concluded as White ethnicity, older and of lower education. National identity, immigration and the costs of EU membership are the most significant reasons for why 51.9% of voters wanted to leave the EU. Each issue had constant media attention throughout the campaign, causing them to become salient issues. However, since the campaigns have ended, the attention dedicated to immigration and the costs of EU membership has declined. National identity and sovereignty however have stayed at the forefront of the Brexit process. The importance of a nation’s power will never decline, hence why national identity and taking back control will always be significant when processing Brexit. Vote Leave won due to running a more efficient campaign. Significantly, their simple slogan, ‘Vote Leave, Take Control’ was memorable to voters, alongside their key issues such as immigration and the  £350 million weekly EU fee. The passions of their campaign figureheads got voters listening, compared to the failed attempts by the Prime Minister. Turnout was also important and as the final result was so close, if more younger people voted, Vote Leave may not have been successful, but recent polls, such as Opinium, have suggested turnout may not have been as significant as originally thought. This research is important as it gives a clear quantitative and qualitative analysis of why the 2016 referendum resulted in a vote for Britain leaving the European Union. There was limited credible research on the topic, due to the main publishing being newspapers articles, where political bias is high. Furthermore, other papers such as The House of Commons EU Referendum Briefing paper discredited certain significant trends, such as the correlation between age and turnout, additionally socio-economic indicators and voting to leave. Therefore, reliable research needed to be developed to analyse why 51.9% of voters wanted to leave the EU, and only then can it be understood what people want from the result. Appendix Immigration Questionnaire What is your age?What is your gender?What race/ethnicity best describes you?Current UK residency? What is your greatest source of information regarding news and current affairs?Which one of these is the biggest issue facing the UK right now?EconomyHealthcareImmigrationTerrorismEducationOtherDo you think immigration has become a bigger issue in the UK in the past 2 years?On a scale from 1-5 how concerned are you about EU immigration? (1= no concern, 5= concerned)On a scale from 1-5 how concerned are you about EU immigration? (1= no concern, 5= concerned)On a scale from 1-5 (1=negative, 5=positive), do you think immigration has an effect onBritish cultureCrimeJob shortagesEconomyTerrorismWhat is your preference regarding current levels of immigration into the UK?Increase a lotIncrease a little Remain the sameDecrease a littleDecrease a lotDon’t know Sample size – 126 online, 36 face to face Due to the use of online surveying, the survey was not totally representative of the British Adult population. The online survey attracted younger respondents, making the results significantly skewed towards 18-24 year olds. An attempt to overcome this problem was made by conducting face-to-face surveys, as it was easier to target the audience. This was a success, however it was difficult to get as many respondents, as few people wanted to take the time to complete the survey. Bibliography Acharya, D. (2016). Brexit in 2016 and 1975: Two historical EU referendums speak of two different ideas of Britain. [online] Firstpost. Available at: http://www.firstpost.com/world/brexit-in-2016-and-1975-two-historical-eu-referendums-speak-of-two-different-ideas-of-britain-2853954.html [Accessed 23 Mar. 2017]. Ashcroft, L. (2005).  How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday†¦ and why. [online] Available at: How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday and why [Accessed 3 Dec. 2016]. Ashcroft, M. and Culwick, K., (2016). Well you did ask: Why the UK voted to leave the EU. United Kingdom: Biteback Publishing. BBC News. (2016). Eight reasons Leave won the UKs referendum on the EU BBC News. [online] Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36574526 [Accessed 23 Mar. 2017]. Boult, A. (2016). Millennials fury over baby boomers vote for Brexit. The Telegraph. [online] Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/millenials-fury-over-baby-boomers-vote-for-brexit/ [Accessed 28 Jan. 2017]. Clarke, H., Goodwin, M. and Whitely, P. (2016). Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level of Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote. 1st ed. Coles, M., Krol, C. and Kirk, A. (2016). EU referendum results and maps: Full breakdown and find out how your area voted. The Telegraph. [online] Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/23/leave-or-remain-eu-referendum-results-and-live-maps/ [Accessed 31 Jan. 2017]. The Economist, (2016).  Brexit Brief: Dreaming of Sovereignty, [online] Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21695056-talk-taking-back-power-may-be-delusional-more-democracy-not-dreaming-sovereignty [Accessed 18 Mar. 2017]. Election Study Team, (2016).  Brexit Britain: British Election Study Insights from the post-EU Referendum wave of the BES internet panel The British Election Study. [online] Britishelectionstudy.com. Available at: http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-resources/brexit-britain-british-election-study-insights-from-the-post-eu-referendum-wave-of-the-bes-internet-panel/#.WM1CyMdO_zK [Accessed 18 Mar. 2017]. Elgot, J. (2016). Young remain voters came out in force, but were outgunned. [online] The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/young-remain-voters-came-out-in-force-but-were-outgunned [Accessed 20 Mar. 2017]. Helm, T. (2016). EU referendum: youth turnout almost twice as high as first thought. [online] The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/09/young-people-referendum-turnout-brexit-twice-as-high [Accessed 20 Mar. 2017]. Kirk, A. and Dunford, D. (2016). How did turnout affect the EU referendum result?. The Telegraph. [online] Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/how-did-turnout-affect-the-eu-referendum-result/ [Accessed 3 Dec. 2016]. Martinson, J. (2016). Did the Mail and Sun help swing the UK towards Brexit?. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/24/mail-sun-uk-brexit-newspapers [Accessed 21 Mar. 2017]. Proto, L. (2016). Sadiq khan: Controversial see-saw EU poster reinforces stereotypes. Politics. [online] Available at: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/sadiq-khan-eu-vote-poster-reinforces-stereotypes-a3257506.html [Accessed 13 Feb. 2017]. Swales, K. (2016). Understanding the Leave vote. 1st ed. [ebook] NatCen Social Research. Available at: http://whatukthinks.org/eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/NatCen_Brexplanations-report-FINAL-WEB2.pdf [Accessed 21 Mar. 2017]. Uberoi, E., (2016), European Union Referendum 2016 Briefing Paper, Number CBP 7639, House of Common Library Uberoi, E., (2016), Brexit: National Identity and Ethnicity in the Referendum, Availiabnle at: https://secondreading.uk/elections/brexit-national-identity-and-ethnicity-in-the-referendum/, [Accessed 21 Mar. 2017]. University of Oxford. (2016). The pull of the UK for EU migrants | Ox.ac.uk. [online] Available at: http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2016-04-13-pull-uk-eu-migrants [Accessed 12 Apr. 2017]. YouGov, (n.d.), Research Q+A’s, Available from: https://yougov.co.uk/about/panel-methodology/research-qs/, [Accessed 21 Mar. 2017].